What's Happening?

Recent AI analysis has cast doubt on the authenticity of two paintings attributed to Jan van Eyck, located in the Philadelphia Museum of Art and the Royal Museums of Turin. The analysis, conducted by Art Recognition, a Swiss company, found a 91% negative result for the Philadelphia painting and an 86% negative result for the Turin version, suggesting they may not be by Van Eyck himself. These findings support the theory that both paintings could be studio works, produced in Van Eyck's workshop but not directly by him. The results have surprised art historians and raised questions about the true origins of these works.

Why It's Important?

The implications of these findings are significant for the art world, particularly for the museums housing these paintings. If confirmed, the reclassification of these works could affect their historical and monetary value. The use of AI in art authentication represents a growing trend in leveraging technology to provide insights into art history, potentially reshaping our understanding of artistic authorship. This development also highlights the complexities of art attribution and the challenges museums face in verifying the authenticity of their collections.

What's Next?

Further investigations and analyses are likely to follow as museums and art historians seek to confirm the findings. The Philadelphia and Turin museums may need to reassess the provenance and display of these paintings. The broader art community will be watching closely to see how AI technology continues to influence art authentication processes. This case may prompt other institutions to employ similar technologies to verify the authenticity of their collections.

AI Generated Content

For the benefit of users - Parts of this article may include content generated using AI tools. Our teams are making active and commercially reasonable efforts to moderate all AI generated content. Our moderation processes are improving however our processes are carried out on a best-effort basis and may not be exhaustive in nature. We encourage our users to consume the content judiciously and rely on their own research for accuracy of facts. We maintain that all AI generated content on our platform is for entertainment purposes only. To know more about how we use AI, you can write to us at

Close AI Generated Content